12
Jun

NCAA LogoAs an avid football fan (and former high school player) I have to say that I am a bit disturbed by what is happening currently with the NCAA. For those of you who may have been living under a rock for some time now, the Pac 10 is on the verge of becoming the Pac 16, the big 10 has 12 teams, the big 12 has 10 teams, and their is chaos every where in between. Once the dust settles it will be easier to see what exactly happened, but in the mean time I can only speculate as to the problems that will arise after its all said and done.

Let me start by saying that I am all for teams moving around conferences under the right circumstances. To me the right circumstance in this situation would only be if the reason for the switch was to incorporate Boise State, TCU and Utah into big time conferences. Though it seems that those schools are going to be staying put through all of this, so in reality whats the point? I mean I could understand if Nebraska got paid to leave, to make room for Utah, or something along those lines, but that did not happen, they are moving for the sake of movement. Thats my first gripe and im sure many would agree that this does nothing to fix whats wrong with college football, and in some ways makes it worse.

Now assuming someone could explain to me why Boise, TCU, and Utah are not coming into bcs conferences what about the Texas schools? Texas and Texas Tech want to move to the pac 10, and Texas A&M wants to pitch their tent in the SEC? I mean do these conference names mean nothing? South Eastern Conference, if you can show me on a map that Texas is considered a south east state then I suppose we can talk, but barring any major shake up in world geography I think im right. Whats next, the University of Southern California is going to travel to the Big East? Its absurd!

Now putting my capitalist hat on for a second, I understand at the core why this is happening, and anyone who understands money should as well. Texas A&M can bring in a lot more money if its playing its games against opponents people actually care about. Aggies vs. the Gators is going to draw a lot more fans than Aggies vs. Wildcats. Considering that its just a capitalist ploy for more profits, it still makes me sick that a guy (or girl) student athlete can lose a year of eligibility if someone wants to buy them a free happy meal. A&M will make more money off its athletes than ever before, and most of them will still struggle for four years trying to feed themselves after the dining halls close.

There is certainly a lot to be debated here, so lets get those comments rolling and see whats what.

No related posts.

Category : College Football

7 Responses to “NCAA Shake Up”


Stocks on Wall Street June 14, 2010

New refined Pac-10 going to make it that much harder for ASU to compete. Hope they end up just bringing in Colorado and Texas and we call it the 12-Pac!!!

PJ Foti June 14, 2010

Colorado to my knowledge is already there, and I dont think youll get Texas, they will be able to get a lot more money and attention in the SEC, but crazier things have certainly happened.

Stocks on Wall Street June 14, 2010

I don’t know original reports had both Texas and Oklahoma schools coming to Pac-10. We do already have Colorado but think we will eventually land the teams mentioned above has Texas can be the Top-dog in the PAC-10 whereas another competitor in the SEC.

PJ Foti June 14, 2010

Its all about the Benjamins son, and the SEC can bring in a lot bigger numbers and revenue with Longhorns v. Gators as opposed to Longhorns v. Washington or ASU.

Stocks on Wall Street June 14, 2010

Just announced on ESPN, both Texas and Oklahoma schools within hours of signing up with the Pac-10 turning down the SEC offer.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5284375

Stocks on Wall Street June 14, 2010

Plus feel PAC-10 can offer the matchups the two you mentioned are the weakest Pac-10 teams versus the top SEC teams on the other hand how bout matchups of.

Texas vs USC (probalby the best National Championship game seen in a long long time)

where SEC could be

Texas vs Vanderbildt or Mississipi State

PJ Foti June 15, 2010

Outside of USC the Pac 10 is weak up and down. Whereas every team in the SEC is strong, but you wouldnt always notice it because of the perennial powerhouses there. So yes everyone wants to see USC but thats once a year, Texas would be tested every week in the SEC, and every game would be fun to watch, I dont think youd see any 50-7 blowouts if they were in the SEC, in the Pac 10 however you might see a few.



Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes